The Effect of Suture-Mediated Closure Device on Hemostasis in Patients after Transfemoral Cardiac Procedures - an Evidence-Based Practice
Patients who used manual compression after transfemoral cardiac procedures could suffer from several problems. The suture-mediated closure device may be proven as an effective alternative, offering earlier sheath removal, and potentially a reduction in vascular complications. The aim of this study was to discover empirical bases and clinical application of suture-mediated closure devices on hemostasis in patients after transfemoral cardiac procedures. This study was applied on evidence-based practice in the clinical setting. The search process for evidence-based practices used 3 databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science, obtaining 14 studies published between 2000 and 2016. The studies selected were assessed by two reviewers for their methodological quality and level of evidence prior to inclusion in the review. Research subjects were patients at the age of ≥ 20 years old who suffered from coronary artery disease and required transfemoral cardiac procedures. This study was implemented in a Medical Intensive Care Unit, Changhua Christian Hospital. The hemostasis status was evaluated based on two categories of, bleeding or not bleeding. Six patients were included in this study. Most of the patients were male with average age of 69.33 ± 11.70 years old. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia were their common history of diseases. Based on the evaluation outcome, five patients showed hemostasis status and only one patient had bleeding after the compression procedures. This study concludes that the suture-mediated closure device is effective for patients after transfemoral cardiac procedures to reach hemostasis status quickly based on clinical evaluation.
Arora, N., Matheny, M, E., Sepke, C., & Resnic, F. (2017). A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. American Heart Journal, 153(4), 606–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2006.12.014
Dauerman, H, L., Applegate, R, J., & Cohen, D, J. (2007). Vascular closure devices: the second decad. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 50(17), 1617–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.028
Hamel, W, J. (2009). Femoral artery closure after cardiac catheterization. Critical care nurse. 29(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2009157
Holly, C., Salmond, S, W., & Saimbert, M. (2011). Comprehensive systematic review for advanced nursing practice. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Jadad, A, R., Moore, R, A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/: https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions. Explanation and Elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W-65-W-94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Martin, J. L., Pratsos, A., Magargee, E., Mayhew, K., Pensyl, C., Nunn, M., & Shapiro, T. (2008). A randomized trial comparing compression, perclose proglideTM and Angio‐Seal VIPTM for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: The cap trial. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 71(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21333
Masita, M., Musdi, E., & Subhan, M. (2012). Peningkatan Aktivitas Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching And Learning). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1).
Merriweather, N., & Sulzbach-Hoke, L, M. (2012). Managing risk of complications at femoral vascular access sites in percutaneous coronary intervention. Critical Care Nurse, 32(5), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2012123
Moscucci, M. (2013). Grossman & Baim’s Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. D., Go, A, S., Arnett, D, K., Blaha, M, J., & Cushman, M. (2016). Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 133(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350
Nelson, P. R., Kracjer, Z., Kansal, N., Rao, V., Bianchi, C., Hashemi, H., & Bacharach, J. M. (2014). A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial). Journal of Vascular Surgery, 59(5), 1181–1193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.101
Ohira, T., & Iso, H. (2013). Cardiovascular disease epidemiology in Asia. Circulation Journal, 77(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-13-0702
Pollard, S., Munks, K., Wales, C., Crossman, D., Cumberland, D., Oakley, G., & Gunn, J. (2003). Position and Mobilisation Post-Angiography Study (PAMPAS): a comparison of 4.5 hours and 2.5 hours bed rest. Heart, 89(4). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.4.447
Schulz-Schüpke, S., Helde, S., Gewalt, S., Ibrahim, T., Linhardt, M., Haas, K., & Bradaric, C. (2014). Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 312(19). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15305
Schwartz, B, G., Burstein, S., Economides, C., Kloner, R, A., Shavelle, D, M., & Mayeda, G, S. (2010). Review of vascular closure devices. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 12(22).
Seo, H, J., & Kim, K, U. (2012). Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-129
Shea, B, J., Grimshaw, J, M., Wells, G, A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., & Bouter, L, M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10
Thompson, D, R., & Webster, R, A. (2004). Caring for the Coronary Patient. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Tron, C., Koning, R., Eltchaninoff, H., Douillet, R., Chassaing, S., Sanchez-Giron, C., & Cribier, A. (2003). A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 16(3), 217–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.8044.x
Vinayakumar, D., Kayakkal, S., Rajasekharan, S., Thottian, J, J., Sankaran, P., & Bastian, C. (2017). 24 h and 30 day outcome of Perclose Proglide suture mediated vascular closure device: An Indian experience. Indian Heart Journal, 69(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.008
Copyright (c) 2021 Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.