Are Psychological Empowerment, Quality of Work Life, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction Necessary for Employee Performance in Manufacturing? Dual-Analysis SEM-PLS and NCA

  • Muhammad Zain Alfain Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Vitradesie Noekent Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Rama Fajar Shidiq Universitas Negeri Semarang
Keywords: control variable, employee performance (EP), job satisfaction (JS), manufacturing, necessary condition analysis (NCA), organizational commitment (OC), psychological empowerment (PE), quality of work life (QWL), smartpls

Abstract

The manufacturing sector in Indonesia serves as a strategic economic pillar, significantly contributing to national growth. With a target to account for more than 20% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2024. this sector not only drives economic development but also absorbs a substantial portion of the workforceThis study investigates the relationships between Psychological Empowerment, Quality of Work Life, Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction , and Employee Performance. Data from 287 Manufacturing employees in Kendal were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA). The results show that Psychological Empowerment and Quality of Work Life significantly influence Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction. Both factors are also necessary conditions for these outcomes. Organizational Commitment and Quality of Work Life significantly impact Employee Performance, but Job Satisfaction does not directly affect performance in SEM. However, NCA identifies Job Satisfaction as a necessary condition for performance, emphasizing the dual importance of sufficient and necessary thresholds in Psychological Empowerment and Quality of Work Life. The study’s originality lies in combining SEM-PLS and NCA for a comprehensive analysis and exploring these relationships in an Indonesian manufacturing context. Practical implications include prioritizing employee empowerment, supportive work environments, and competitive compensation. Limitations involve the exclusion of other variables and affecting generalizability.

References

Ahmad, M. R. Nawaz, M. I. Ishaq, M. M. Khan, and H. A. Ashraf. 2023. “Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. January, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921.

Anggraini, B. Muchtar, and E. Masdupi. 2019. “Effect Of Remuneration, Work Motivation and Oganizational Commitment To Job performance,” in 2nd Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2018), Atlantis Press. pp. 407–415.

Arefin, M. S. Alam, M. R. Islam, and M. Rahaman. 2019. “High-performance work systems and job engagement: The mediating role of psychological empowerment,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1664204

Aung, D. S. Santoso, and T. C. Dodanwala. 2023. “Effects of demotivational managerial practices on job satisfaction and job performance: Empirical evidence from Myanmar’s construction industry,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag. - JET-M, vol. 67, Jan. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101730.

B.-K. Joo and I. Lee, “Workplace happiness: work engagement, career satisfaction, and subjective well-being,” in Evidence-based HRM: A global forum for empirical scholarship, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017, pp. 206–221.

Bernerth, M. S. Cole, E. C. Taylor, and H. J. Walker. 2018. “Control variables in leadership research: A qualitative and quantitative review,” J. Manage., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 131–160,

Bhardwaj, S. Mishra, and T. K. Jain. 2021. “An analysis to understanding the job satisfaction of employees in banking industry,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 37, pp. 170–174

BPS, “Proporsi Nilai Tambah Sektor Industri Manufaktur Terhadap PDB, 2022-2023. Retrieved from Badan Pusat Statistik,” Badan Pusat Statistik. Accessed: Jul. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTIxNCMy/proporsi-nilai-tambah-sektor-industri-manufaktur-terhadap-pdb.html

BPS, “Excecutive Summary Perekonomian Kendal 2021.,” Badan Pusat Statistik. Accessed: Apr. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://kendalkab.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2022/04/02/186/executive-summary-perekonomian-kendal-2021.html

Conger and R. N. Kanungo. 1988. “The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 471–482

Dhamija, S. Gupta, and S. Bag. 2019. “Measuring of job satisfaction: the use of quality of work life factors,” Benchmarking An Int. J., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 871–892

Ebbes, Z. Huang, and A. Rangaswamy.2016. “Sampling designs for recovering local and global characteristics of social networks,” Int. J. Res. Mark., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 578–599, 2016.

Ehido, B. A. Halim, and Z. Awang. 2019. “The influence of quality of work life (QWL) and organizational commitment on job performance among academics in the Malaysian public universities,” [Online]. Available: www.socialsciencejournal.in

Iqbal, N. H. Ahmad, A. Nasim, and S. A. R. Khan. 2020. “A moderated-mediation analysis of psychological empowerment: Sustainable leadership and sustainable performance,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 262, p. 121429, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121429.

Katebi, M. H. HajiZadeh, A. Bordbar, and A. M. Salehi. 2022. “The Relationship Between ‘Job Satisfaction’ and ‘Job Performance’: A Meta-analysis,” Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–42, Mar. doi: 10.1007/s40171-021-00280-y.

Kock and M. Moqbel. 2021. “Social Networking Site Use, Positive Emotions, and Job Performance,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 163–173, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2019.1571457.

Mathew and S. Nair. 2022. “Psychological empowerment and job satisfaction: A meta-analytic review,” Vision, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 431–440

Ochoa Pacheco, D. Coello-Montecel, and M. Tello. 2023. “Psychological Empowerment and Job Performance: Examining Serial Mediation Effects of Self-Efficacy and Affective Commitment,” Adm. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, doi: 10.3390/admsci13030076.

Rajabi, J. Boles, T. G. Brashear Alejandro, and S. Sarin. 2019. “Revisiting and replicating the dominant logic on salesperson job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 126, pp. 524–532, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres. 10.067.

Ramasamy, I. Inore, K. Muduli, and S. Singh. 2023. “Evaluation of Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction Pathways for Improved Sustainable Business Performance in Emerging Economies,” Int. J. Soc. Ecol. Sustain. Dev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–17, doi: 10.4018/IJSESD.328217.

Richter, S. Schubring, S. Hauff, C. M. Ringle, and .... 2020. “When predictors of outcomes are necessary: Guidelines for the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA,” … Manag. &data …, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-11-2019-0638.

Sainju, C. Hartwell, and J. Edwards. 2021. “Job satisfaction and employee turnover determinants in Fortune 50 companies: Insights from employee reviews from Indeed. com,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 148, p. 113582

Sanjaya and L. Indrawati. 2023. “The influence of job satisfaction, work motivation, and employee commitment on employee performance,” Res. Manag. Account., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–20,

Sarstedt, J. F. Hair Jr, C. Nitzl, C. M. Ringle, and M. C. Howard. 2020. “Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses!,” Int. J. Mark. Res., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 288–299

Seibert, G. Wang, and S. H. Courtright. 2011. “Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 96, no. 5, p. 981,

Shah. T.A. M. N. Khattak, R. Zolin, and S. Z. A. Shah. 2019. “Psychological empowerment and employee attitudinal outcomes: The pivotal role of psychological capital,” Manag. Res. Rev., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 797–81.

Tarigan, A. R. S. Susanto, S. E. Hatane, F. Jie, and F. Foedjiawati. 2020. “Corporate social responsibility, job pursuit intention, quality of work life and employee performance: case study from Indonesia controversial industry,” Asia-Pacific J. Bus. Adm., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 141–158, doi: 10.1108/APJBA-09-2019-0189.

Utama. 2023. “The Influence of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Satisfaction on Employee Productivity of The National Amil Zakat Board (BAZNAS):(Literature Review of Human Resource Management),” Eastasouth Manag. Bus., vol. 1, no. 03, pp. 120–127,

Wahyuningtyasti, M. Anwar, and I. K. Swasti. 2023. “Commitment to Mediate the Influence of Interpersonal Skills and Competence on Employee Performance,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Anal., vol. 6, no. 05, pp. 2142–2151

Wibowo and R. Bhinekawati. 2020. “The Influence of Leadership Communications Mediated by Feeling Valued and Involved, on Employee Engagement:(A Case Study of PT Sanggar Sarana Baja Change Management),” in 6th Annual International Conference on Management Research (AICMaR 2019), Atlantis Press, , pp. 107–112.

Yusnita, H. Gursida, and E. Herlina. 2022. “The Role of Work-Life Balance and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Organizational Commitment,” J. Econ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 103–114,

Published
2025-10-01
How to Cite
Alfain, M. Z., Noekent, V., & Shidiq, R. F. (2025). Are Psychological Empowerment, Quality of Work Life, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction Necessary for Employee Performance in Manufacturing? Dual-Analysis SEM-PLS and NCA. Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research, 7(5), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.37287/ijghr.v7i5.6767