The Relationship of Delivery Method and Family Planning History with Via Examination Results (Visual Inspection of Acetic Acid)”
Abstract
VIA (Visual Acetic Acid Inspection) is a type of examination to detect cervical cancer. There are several factors that can cause positive VIA results and every couple of childbearing age (PUS) should carry out early detection of cervical cancer once a year, one of which is through an VIA examination. However, unfortunately there are still many couples of childbearing age who have not done so and when the examination is carried out, some of the results are positive and are even in an advanced stage. The Objective of this study was to determine the relationship between delivery method and birth control history with the results of VIA examination (visual inspection of acetic acid).
This type of observational analytic research, cross-sectional design. The research population was all couple of childbearing age (PUS) in Malang Regency. The inclusion criteria were carrying out a VIA examination at the Polowijen Malang Community Health Center and having given birth. The sample consisted of 34 respondents. The research was carried out on November 8 2023. Data was collected by conducting interviews about birth methods and family planning history as well as conducting VIA examinations. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test. There is no relationship between the method of delivery and the results of the VIA examination which is statistically significant with a P value = 0.223. Vaginal delivery does not always cause cervical injury which is needed by HPV to penetrate the transformation zone which can gradually lead to precancerous lesions or positive VIA results. There is no relationship between history of family planning use and VIA examination results which is statistically significant with p value = 0.994. Women who have never used hormonal or non-hormonal contraception can also experience precancerous lesions or positive VIA examination results.
References
Abdullah S, Bawotong J, Hamel R. (2013). The relationship between the use of hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptives with the incidence of cervical cancer in the upper upper room, prof. Dr. R.d. Kandou Manado. FK Unsrat nursing e-journal.
Ahmad M, As'ad s, Arifuddin S. (2021). Improved Health and Access to Early Cervical Cancer Screening. Riau: Tuanku Tambusai Pahlawan University.
Fitrisia, Khambri, Utama, and Muhammad S. (2019). Analysis of Factors Associated with the Incidence of Pre-Cancerous Cervical Lesions in Women of Childbearing Age Couples in the Muara Bungo Community Health Center Working Area. Andalas Health Journal.
Fontham, E. T. (2020). Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. Bathesda: American cancer society.
Hanh-Ha D Nguyen, MD, MPH; Editor in Chief: Michel E Rivlin, MD. (2023). Benign Cervical Lesions. Medscape.
Irianiwati. (2023). The role of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection in the incidence of cervical cancer. Ministry of Health.
Ningsih, E. (2022). Normal or Caesarean Delivery, Here's the Comparison. EMC Health Care.
Pasiowan S, Lontaan A, Rantung M. (2015). Factors Associated with Birth Canal Tears in Maternal Mothers. Midwife Scientific Journal.
Putri, G. (2020). Women are at Risk of Cervical Cancer. Jakarta: Ministry of Health.
Rahmawati L, Ningsih MP. (2020). Factors associated with the incidence of cervical precancerous lesions in the Padang Pasir Puskesmas Padang City. Medikes (Health Information Media).
Setianingsih E, Astuti Y, Aisyaroh N. (2022). Factors That Influence the Occurrence of Cervical Cancer. Pannmed, 47-54.
Zamroni, M. (2022). Breast and Cervical Cancer Dominate in 2021, Health Department Asks for SMART. Malang: Malang City Government.
Copyright (c) 2024 Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.